Republican Seattle City Attorney rebukes Trump’s sanctuary city policy, joins legal challenge
Mar 4, 2025, 4:59 AM
Seattle City Attorney Ann Davison announced that the City of Seattle has joined a coalition of municipalities across the country in a legal challenge against the Trump administration’s policies targeting sanctuary cities and counties. The lawsuit, filed on February 27, 2025, argues the administration’s executive orders and directives violate constitutional protections and infringe on local control.
Davison, a Republican, issued a statement emphasizing Seattle’s long-standing position as a “welcoming city” and its refusal to be “co-opted” into federal immigration enforcement. She asserted that the city’s policies are legal and designed to ensure public safety by fostering trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities.
“It is not against the law to be a welcoming city,” Davison said in a press release. “For more than 20 years, the City of Seattle, by ordinance, has directed its employees to not inquire about a person’s immigration status, absent a legal obligation to do so. It is well within our authority to direct our employees in this manner.”
What does the legal challenge argue?
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, includes San Francisco, Portland, King County and other cities and counties as plaintiffs. It challenges executive orders signed by President Trump upon taking office for a second term, which seek to reinstate policies from his first administration. The orders direct federal agencies to withhold funding from jurisdictions that do not cooperate with federal immigration authorities and mandate compliance with federal immigration enforcement policies.
According to the complaint, the orders violate the 10th Amendment, the Separation of Powers doctrine and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit argues that Trump’s administration is attempting to “coerce local authorities” and “commandeer them into carrying out his agenda,” despite prior court rulings declaring such efforts unconstitutional.
Seattle and other plaintiffs argue that local governments have the right to set their own public safety policies.
The legal challenge also contends the administration’s policies could result in severe financial consequences for cities that refuse to comply. The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Pamela Bondi, has issued warnings that jurisdictions failing to adhere to federal directives could face funding cuts and legal action.
The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, asking the court to block the implementation of Trump’s executive orders and prevent federal agencies from enforcing funding restrictions based on local immigration policies.
Preserving autonomy for local governments
As the case moves forward, Seattle officials, along with other city leaders, argue the legal battle is not just about immigration enforcement but also about preserving the autonomy of local governments.
“We will not surrender our local autonomy afforded by the Constitution,” Davison declared. “When the rights of Seattle and its residents are threatened, I will use my full legal authority to defend the people of Seattle.”
The Trump administration has yet to respond directly to Seattle’s participation in the lawsuit, but previous statements from the White House have defended the executive orders as necessary measures to enforce immigration laws and protect national security.
