James Comey indictment raises uncomfortable question: are the charges rock solid?
Oct 3, 2025, 5:04 AM
Former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey is surrounded by reporters after testifying to the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees at the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill December 07, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
James Comey is facing a two-count federal indictment alleging that he made false statements to Congress and obstructed justice. However, there’s some concern that the case may not be as straightforward as it seems.
Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan of the Eastern District of Virginia was reportedly under pressure to advance the charges, despite having no prior prosecutorial experience. This raises questions about the strength of the case and the motivations behind it. So what does this mean in the broader context?
Mike Columbo, partner at Dhillon Law Group and member of the Board of Directors for the Republican National Lawyers Association, joined The Jason Rantz Show on Seattle Red 770 AM to break it all down.
“So here in this situation, we have the president who had set out some priorities for law enforcement, and he was hitting some resistance from within his Justice Department, and so he exercised his prerogative to put someone he trusted in that position, and that’s how she wound up there,” Columbo said.
James Comey’s defense begins
Columbo explained that Comey’s likely first defense will be based on selective prosecution. But he suggested that Trump’s past statements demanding Comey’s prosecution could be interpreted not as targeting him, but as frustration over perceived special treatment.
Columbo emphasized that Comey will receive a fair trial and that premature judgments should be withheld until the evidence is presented.
“I am confident that whatever the outcome is, justice will be served, and whether that’s a finding of guilt or not, I think we need to just see what evidence the government presents and trust the system to do its job,” Columbo said.
The case could become a defining moment for the Justice Department’s independence and credibility. Given Comey’s central role in politically sensitive investigations over the past decade, the trial’s outcome may shape public trust in federal law enforcement for years to come.
Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3 p.m. – 7 p.m. on Seattle Red on 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on X, Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook.


